Posted in competitions, writing

500-word competition – year 3 is now open!

Our 500-word competition has reopened with a new judge, Gareth Davies, still with the option of critique. See the 500-word Competition page.

Advertisements
Posted in competitions, critique, literary festival, writing

Results of the 2018-9 BeaconLit’s BeaconFlash 500-word competition

I’m delighted to announce the result of the second BeaconFlash competition but first, a word about year 3. For the 2019/2020 competition, we will have a new judge – therefore the competition may be a little late reopening but we will announce the details as soon as possible.

Okay… now to the results. Drum roll please…

Top 3 (stories in full below)

  1. An Open and Shut Case by Jane Broughton (March 2019 – theme: main character is an inanimate object)… winning £75 plus up to a free critique 5,000 words.
  2. Ringing the Changes by Rosy Edwards (February 2019 – theme: the love affair)… winning £50 plus up to a free critique 4,000 words.
  3. A Public/Private Enterprise by Brenda Daniels (April 2019 – theme: the committee)…winning £25 plus up to a free critique 3,000 words.

The Next Seven AUTHORS… each winning free entry to the 2020 festival

  • Coming of Age by Barbara Young (August 2018 – theme: the first time)
  • The Shed by Carol Allison (April 2019 – theme: the committee)
  • Veg on the Edge by Glyn Davies (March 2019 – theme: main character is an inanimate object)
  • Saving Kaylee by Julia Grieve (September 2018 – theme: not what it seemed)
  • A Special Christmas Gift by Patricia Randall (December 2018 – an alternative Christmas / not feeling festive)
  • A Picture of Innocence (September 2018 – theme: not what it seemed) / Blood Stained, both by Sue Kittles (March 2019 – theme: main character is an inanimate object)
  • Upper Fiddling Town Council by Victoria Trelinska (April 2019 – theme: the committee)

Below are the winning top three stories:

FIRST: An Open and Shut Case (March 2019 – theme: main character is an inanimate object)

Frankie gripped the handle and jammed her shoulder against the door in an effort to hold it shut. The handle jerked painfully and then moved up and down, oiled by the sweat seeping from her pores. Frankie‘s breath came in gasps and she braced her foot against the heavy metal filing cabinet in an attempt to increase her resistance.

The door had seen all this coming. It had watched, in the way doors do, the activities of those unfettered beings that crossed its threshold. It had observed Frankie and had liked her. She pushed it open quickly and was always careful to close it again, gently but firmly. The door felt itself fit safely back into its frame after she’d passed through. On one memorable occasion she’d even rested her forehead against its surface and sighed, dropping salty tears that had coursed down the dry veneer. The door’s wood had warmed and it had allowed the moisture to soak deep into its grain.

It had seen the man who observed Frankie. It had witnessed the hunger flash in his eyes before he turned away. It noticed that the man continued to stare at Frankie obliquely, drinking in her reflection in the office windows.

This man had no respect for doors. He shoved them open and didn’t care if their hinges shrieked in protest. He let them slam shut and never stopped when their frames rattled or splintered. The door also knew he had no respect for Frankie. He wouldn’t care if she shrieked or splintered.

This had been a day like any other. The door had been so busy Frankie had wedged it open. “There,” she’d said, “That’ll save you the bother of opening and closing every few minutes.” It had enjoyed the rest and the way its hinges could stretch out for a while.

Time had passed and the office had emptied. Frankie was tidying her desk when the man had appeared. He hadn’t spoken. He’d pulled a large knife from up his sleeve and started walking towards her. Frankie had raised her hands and then something in his expression galvanised her and she’d leapt up. In one quick movement she’d turned and flung herself towards the filing room. She’d kicked the wedge away and, for the first time, slammed the door.

*

The door felt itself slowly starting to move. Frankie was weakening and could no longer hold the handle. She let it go and pushed both hands against the door desperately trying to hold it shut. The man was too powerful and the door knew that Frankie only had seconds left.

There are immutable laws that govern all portals. The door knew exactly what it was sacrificing but it didn’t hesitate. Its hinges sprung from their fixings and it added its strength to Frankie’s. It landed with the weight of a fallen oak. Both door and man shattered. Blood and sap mingled. Ruby and emerald snaked across the horrified wooden floor.

 

SECOND: Ringing the Changes (February 2019 – theme: the love affair)

The door jingle-jangled, another dripping refugee from the rain. The café was already jammed with sodden shoppers. Ladies had mud spatters up the backs of their stockings, trickling brollies overflowed the umbrella stand, shoes squelched. Seeing she was alone, I wondered whether one of my regulars might make room.

“Mr Maltby? Would you mind if this young lady shared your table?”

“Not at all, Mildred,” he said, looking her over. “My pleasure.”

Taking her order, I also promised to top up his teapot.

By the time I was back with her vanilla slice, they’d struck up a conversation. She was beautiful; long curly brown hair and a really dainty primrose yellow cardi. Anyway, Mr M left me a tanner tip as usual and I thought no more about it.

*

Over the weeks though, I realised they both happened to come in every Saturday around the same time. Initially at separate tables, just exchanging brief pleasantries, then sitting together. A date, you might say. Then I noticed he wasn’t wearing his wedding ring. Nothing wrong with that, him being widowed so long, but significant, I thought.

Must’ve been July. I’d gone to see Way to the Starsat The Adelphi and as I was leaving, something caught my eye in the back row, through the cigarette smoke: that yellow cardi. Definitely them. They didn’t see me of course. Far too… engrossed.

*

Every Saturday at eleven they’d sit in our corner booth, holding hands. Watching them together would brighten my day: seeing him smile again, hearing them giggle. On wet days they sometimes stayed for lunch. On fine days they’d often buy filled rolls and cakes and head for the park with their picnic. Dorothy, her name was. I’d guessed that, when I saw her hankie embroidered with a “D”. Then I heard him say it – and her calling him ‘Henry’.

*

Their romance was blossoming nicely. Then in November I was surprised to see her on a Thursday, with a skinny chap in his de-mob suit. He was skeletal. They sat in the corner quietly while he had three, mark you, three cakes: doughnut, apple turnover and a scone. She wasn’t herself at all, very subdued. But who wouldn’t be – if you were with someone just back from a Japanese POW camp? And she was wearing something different too – a diamond solitaire ring.

I was thanking her for her tip as I cleared their table, when she interrupted me, gripping my arm.

“Thank you, Mildred. You’ve always been so kind. I’m heading back to London next week – getting married.” She smiled up at me, but it never reached her eyes.

*

I was dreading seeing Mr Maltby again, worrying whether he knew. The following Saturday he turned up, but in the afternoon, and chose a seat facing the wall. His shoulders said it all. Leaving hurriedly, he pressed a shilling into my hand and doffed his hat without a word. I never saw either of them again.

 

THIRD: A Public/Private Enterprise (April 2019 – theme: the committee)

Dear Mr Postmaster,

On each visit to your post office over the last nine months, I have stood 35 minutes in a queue. Since my calls are weekly, my total standing time amounts to 1400 minutes or 23.3 hours.

I suggest you join Greenpoint’s Efficiency Committee (a public/private enterprise) to discuss ways of reducing this wait.

I look forward to hearing your thoughts on my suggestion.

Your sincerely,

Anthony Grote (Chairman, Efficiency Committee)

*

Dear Mr Grote,

How lovely to hear from you and to know of your ardent support for our post office.

I know many letters have issued from your home in Greenpoint over the years. I affectionately remember delivering letters to Matilda Grote, your mother, when I was just a postman myself. Thirty-five minutes (that very same number) it took me to walk to the climax of the hill on which her house sat, and back again!

I’m glad you are well.

Kind regards,

Ben Whishaw (Postmaster)

*

Dear Postmaster,

Another week, another 35 minutes waiting. I actually brought a chair with me this time to make the wait more bearable. How about your employees donate their seats to members of the public? Then they would know what it’s like to stand for so long.

Please tell me if you agree to joining our committee.

Sincerely,

Anthony Grote

*

Dear Anthony,

Exciting to hear from you again, and so soon after your last letter. The letter is quite the most intimate form of intercourse isn’t it? But then I’m biased, having been coupled with the service for 49 years!

And what a stimulating idea to ask staff to donate their chairs ‒ it shows how impassioned you are. You take after your adorable mother. I can’t count the number of meals she lavished on me over time. How are you managing to fend for yourself without her?

Warm regards,

Ben Whishaw

*

Postmaster,

Forty minutes! That’s how long it took this week! And blow me down if I didn’t hear the sole attendant on duty asking the young woman in front of me (seated on a chair) how she was doing after having to euthanize her dog. I ask you! What has that to do with efficient postal service? No wonder we spend so long in the queue with all this personal chatter going on.

I absolutely insist you join the Efficiency Committee.

A. Grote

*

My dear Anthony,

Isn’t Edward Brown a gem? He’s been the backbone of our post office for ages. I’ll be sure to pass your comments onto him. He’ll be so pleased you noticed his serviceableness.

Regarding Miss Eleanor and the loss of her dog: Teddy was a loving companion to the woman after her fiancé was killed. I can identify on so many levels. It was after your dear mother died that I poured myself into my own little Nellie. Not a substitute for the affection your mother lavished on me but there you are.

With love,

Ben

*

Postmaster,

The Efficiency Committee has been disbanded.

XX

Posted in competitions, critique, literary festival, writing

BeaconFlash Year 2 Finalists

And the list of the thirty-two final titles are…

  • A Child’s Scent (October 2018 – theme: trick and treat)
  • A Father’s Gift (December 2018 – theme: an alternative Christmas / not feeling festive)
  • A Picture of Innocence (September 2018 – theme: not what it seemed)
  • A Public/Private Enterprise (April 2019 – theme: the committee)
  • A Special Christmas Gift (December 2018 – theme: an alternative Christmas / not feeling festive)
  • A Windy Day (October 2018 – theme: trick and treat)
  • An Open and Shut Case (March 2019 – theme: main character is an inanimate object)
  • Blood Stained (March 2019 – theme: main character is an inanimate object)
  • Chasing the First (August 2018 – theme: the first time)
  • Christmas night (December 2018 – theme: an alternative Christmas / not feeling festive)
  • Coming of Age (August 2018 – theme: the first time)
  • Cupboard Love (August 2018 – theme: the first time)
  • Feeling Like You’re Ten Again (May 2019 – theme: young again)
  • Her Eternal Dance (February 2019 – theme: the love affair)
  • Leaving Amy (January 2019 – theme: a fresh start)
  • Lost and Found (January 2019 – theme: a fresh start)
  • Made in Toledo (March 2019 – theme: main character is an inanimate object)
  • Morris Man (November 2018 – theme: a strange tradition)
  • Mrs Fielding (May 2019 – theme: young again)
  • No Ending, No Goodbye (January 2019 – theme: a fresh start)
  • Ringing the Changes (February 2019 – theme: the love affair)
  • Saving Kaylee (September 2018 – theme: not what it seemed)
  • Signs of the Times (November 2018 – theme: a strange tradition)
  • The Answer (February 2019 – theme: the love affair)
  • The Class Reunion (September 2018 – theme: not what it seemed)
  • The Real Love Affair (February 2019 – theme: the love affair)
  • The Shed (April 2019 – theme: the committee)
  • Upper Fiddling Town Council (April 2019 – theme: the committee)
  • Veg on the Edge (March 2019 – theme: main character is an inanimate object)
  • Victor’s Treats (October 2018 – theme: trick and treat)
  • Waiting (November 2018 – theme: a strange tradition)
  • What Goes Around (May 2019 – theme: young again)

The judging will take place in the next few weeks and the results announced at the literary festival on Saturday 13th July (see you there!) where the top three stories will be read out (hopefully by their authors!) after which time those stories will be published on this blog and the main BeaconLit site.

Posted in competitions, critique, literary festival, writing

BeaconLit Second Year 500-word comp Round 10 – May 2019 winners announced

We are delighted to announce the top three stories from May’s entries are (in alphabetical order):

  • Feeling Like You’re Ten Again
  • Mrs Fielding
  • What Goes Around

Narrowly missed out:

  • Breath of Life
  • Whatever it Takes

The three top stories will now go through to the final judging and the top ten prize-winning authors (not necessarily the same as the top ten stories as no author can win more than one prize) will be announced at the 2019 BeaconLit literary festival on Saturday 13th July (a month away!). As with most months, there were more than three stories that could have made the top three but those that did were either closer to the theme or stronger (provoked more of a reaction after reading) so don’t be disheartened if yours hasn’t been mentioned.

If your story for this month isn’t listed in the above three, you are welcome to do whatever you like with your submission hereon in. If your story is listed, it’s possible that it could be placed in the ultimate top ten* which will be published on this website (and on http://www.beaconlit.co.uk) after the festival next month so please do not send it elsewhere until after then. The competition will reopen on 1st August.

If you have requested, and paid for, critique, this will be with you in the next few days.

*

Morgen’s feedback on the stories received this month:

Following the reading of these stories, I thought it might be useful to provide some tips:

  • I add commas where a reader would breathe if reading the piece aloud, which I always recommend the author do too, especially where a scene feels flat or you think it doesn’t work for whatever reason. Tip: although grammatically correct, I recommend that you don’t put commas between adjectives. It slows the pace… really slows it where there are several and anything that slows what should be a fast-paced page-turning read is best avoided.
  • Words often overused include all, now, veryand just. If you search your current work in progress, you may find more than you expected.
  • Song titles are put in italics and don’t need the inverted commas (which would have been speech marks as you use inverted commas for speech).
  • Where an action has ‘starts to’ / ‘started to’ or ‘begins to’ / ‘began to’ before it, most of the time they’re not needed because unless the action is interrupted, the verb alone works better / is stronger. An example would be ‘the phone began to ring’. If it stops without being answered then that’s fine (although it still rang!) but if not then just have ‘the phone rang’.
  • Where the speech has an unrelated dialogue tag, e.g. someone laughing, moving etc. (with it capitalised: He laughed. She picked up the mug.’ etc.) the punctuation would be a full stop rather than a comma. Had it been related description, it would be a comma.
  • Showing is all about the character doing / reacting rather than the narrator telling us what happens. If something feels flat, it could be that you’re telling us too much.
  • Words often overused include all, now, very and, as we have here, just. I’d recommend only keeping the ones for emphasis or detract from the sentence if chopped.
  • It’s fine to use exclamation marks when someone’s shouting (then you’d often not need the ‘he / she shouted’), but just one !
  • It’s good to have as many of the five senses as possible. By default we have sound (dialogue) and sight (narration) but what about taste, touch and smell. It makes a story all the more vivid if we can have one or more of those.
  • Not many of the stories had any colour mentioned. It also gives stories more depth, especially where a shade is used rather than a standard colour. Wikipedia is very good at shades: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shades_of_redis an example.

*

Although Morgen judges on the impact of the stories and the quality of the writing, it’s always disappointing when there are simple spelling mistakes or even simpler errors that should have been picked up during the editing process. Please do read your stories carefully before submitting and ideally show them to someone you trust for their opinion.

*Should you get through to the longlist of 30 stories (three per month over ten months), it doesn’t necessarily mean that your story won’t be chosen if it slips out of the top ten. No author will appear in the top ten twice so a story that came eleventh (or twelfth, thirteenth…) could be bumped up where there are author duplications.

N.B. All the money from this competition goes to BeaconLit funds for the local libraries. Morgen is not charging for her time. Good luck!

Posted in competitions, critique, writing

BeaconLit Second Year 500-word comp Round 9 – April 2019 winners announced

We are delighted to announce the top three stories from April’s entries are (in alphabetical order):

Favourite stories:

  • A Public/Private Enterprise
  • The Shed
  • Upper Fiddling Town Council

Narrow missed out:

  • Missing Without Trace
  • Sausages
  • The Numbers Game

The three top stories will now go through to the final judging and the top ten prize-winning authors (not necessarily the same as the top ten stories as no author can win more than one prize) will be announced at the 2019 BeaconLit literary festival on Saturday 13th July. As with most months, there were more than three stories that could have made the top three but those that did were either closer to the theme or stronger (provoked more of a reaction after reading) so don’t be disheartened if yours hasn’t been mentioned.

If your story isn’t listed in the above three, you are welcome to do whatever you like with your submission hereon in. If your story is listed, it’s possible that it could be placed in the ultimate top ten* which will be published on this website (and on http://www.beaconlit.co.uk) late July so please do not send it elsewhere until after the literary festival.

If you have requested, and paid for, critique, this will be with you in the next few days. The current (May’s) theme, the final for this year’s competition, is ‘young again’, used however it strikes you.

*

Morgen’s feedback on the stories received this month:

Another very interesting batch. Many enjoyable, some strange (and therefore both!), some with more of a connection to the theme of the committee than others. It’s usually a ‘wow’ story that gets picked for the shortlist and, without fail, we had at least one of those this month.

Not for the first time, one or more of the stories this month was close 498-500 to the 500-word mark. It’s risky as it only takes an unhyphenated adjective (e.g. a well-dressed man vs. the man was well dressed) to push it over the 500. I’d recommend not going over 490 and there are always words that can be chopped… including ‘that’s, ‘which was’ etc.

Following the reading of these stories, I thought it might be useful to provide some tips:

  • when writing past tense narration, last nightis present tense should ‘the previous night’ or ‘the night before’. Likewise,yesterday is the day before / a day earlier,tonight isn’t tonight but that evening / night, tomorrow isn’t tomorrow but the next day / the day after, today is that day, last week being the previous week. Ditto ‘two years ago’ wouldn’t actually be two years ago. Dialogue is present tense so they’re fine in speech but not when writing a past tense story.
  • when you’re writing someone’s name when another character is speaking to them, you’d need a comma before the name, i.e. ‘Do you know John?’ is asking if the person knows someone called John. ‘Do you know, John?’ means that the character is speaking to someone called John but asking them if they know something. A subtle difference but you want to avoid confusing the reader so they jump out of the story.
  • don’t forget to use as many of the five senses as possible. By default we have sound (dialogue) and sight (narration) but what about taste, touch and smell. It makes a story all the more vivid if we can have one or more of those.
  • I add commas where a reader would breathe if reading the piece aloud, which I always recommend the author do too, especially where a scene feels flat or you think it doesn’t work for whatever reason. Tip: although grammatically correct, I recommend that you don’t put commas between adjectives. It slows the pace… really slows it where there are several and anything that slows what should be a fast-paced page-turning read is best avoided.
  • unless a name, e.g. Thornton Village Committee, the committee is a common noun (like the doctor, the mother etc.) so would be small c.
  • like ‘erm’, we do say ‘well’ as a dialogue pause but it’s best not to include it in our writing, or at the most have it as a characteristic for one of the characters. Ditto ‘look’.
  • where possible, try to avoid splitting infinitive, e.g. ‘Terry turned over the page’ rather than ‘Terry turned the page over, the verb being ‘to turn over’. Sometimes, sticking to the rules will make the sentence clunky so you can’t always keep the two words together, e.g. ‘Tom put the book down onto the table.’ rather than ‘Tom put down the book onto the table.’ but where it’s unlikely to jar the reader then it makes for better English.
  • I recommend not inverting the dialogue tags as it’s not how we would naturally speak if talking aloud so to change ‘said Tony’ to ‘Tony said’. And there’s nothing wrong with said but if you have an accompanying adverb, e.g. said quietly then a stronger verb – whispered or mumbled in this case – is always preferable. Also where you have someone doing something, you don’t need the said, e.g. ‘That’s not fair.’ Mike slammed his fist onto the table.
  • technically, ‘now’ (and right now) is present tense, which is fine in dialogue but not in past tense narration. All, now, very and just are often overused so I recommend seeing how many you have in a piece and chopping where possible.

*

Although Morgen judges on the impact of the stories and the quality of the writing, it’s always disappointing when there are simple spelling mistakes or even simpler errors that should have been picked up during the editing process. Please do read your stories carefully before submitting and ideally show them to someone you trust for their opinion.

*Should you get through to the longlist of 30 stories (three per month over ten months), it doesn’t necessarily mean that your story won’t be chosen if it slips out of the top ten. No author will appear in the top ten twice so a story that came eleventh (or twelfth, thirteenth…) could be bumped up where there are author duplications.

And now you can also receive feedback on your story / stories at £5 per story with the optional critique service (given by the judge, Morgen Bailey, who is a professional editor for publishers and independent authors). This option is detailed on the main 500-word Competition page with an option to select critique within the entry form.

N.B. All the money from this competition goes to BeaconLit funds for the local libraries. Morgen is not charging for her time. Good luck!

Posted in competitions, critique, writing

BeaconLit Second Year 500-word comp Round 8 – March 2019 winners announced

We are delighted to announce the top five – yes, five this month! – stories from March’s entries are (in alphabetical order):

  • An Open and Shut Case
  • Blood Stained
  • Made in Toledo
  • Ties That Bind
  • Veg on the Edge

These stories will now go through to the final judging and the top ten prize-winning authors (not necessarily the same as the top ten stories as no author can win more than one prize) will be announced at the 2019 BeaconLit literary festival on Saturday 13th July. As with most months, there were more stories that could have made the top selected but those that did were either closer to the theme or stronger (provoked more of a reaction after reading) so don’t be disheartened if yours hasn’t been mentioned.

If your story for this month isn’t listed above, you are welcome to do whatever you like with your submission hereon in. If your story is listed, it’s possible that it could be placed in the ultimate top ten* which will be published on this website (and on http://www.beaconlit.co.uk) next July so please do not send it elsewhere until after the literary festival.

If you have requested, and paid for, critique, this will be with you in the next few days.

*

Morgen’s feedback on the stories received this month:

A very interesting batch this month and one that I knew would make or break. I love giving objects a voice so this is one of my favourite prompts but it can be a confusing one. Here’s why:

Three stories were disqualified this month for not following the brief – one a first-person narration, the others were third-person point of view. The theme stated that the main character had to be an inanimate object. Therefore any stories with a human as a main character with the secondary focus on an inanimate object, wasn’t following the rules. Sorry but to be fair to everyone, this has to be strictly adhered to.

There were several stories that could have made the top ones, including some with clever last lines or the reveal of what the object was close to the ending, so the reader could be challenged (in a good way) to work out what it was. I chose the final four because I got to the end and went “Wow”. Others were just as clever, perhaps even more elaborate, but had less impact; they were funny, sweet or sad but just missed out on having the ‘punch’ of the finalists of this round.

Following the reading of these stories, I thought it might be useful to provide some tips:

  • Wherever you have dialogue, read the exchange aloud without the description, e.g. no he said / she said etc. Does it sound genuine? We don’t speak in perfectly formed sentences. We interrupt each other. Have someone play the other person. They can give you feedback.
  • Where an action has ‘starts to’ / ‘started to’ or ‘begins to’ / ‘began to’ before it, most of the time they’re not needed because unless the action is interrupted, the verb alone works better / is stronger. An example would be ‘the phone began to ring’. If it stops without being answered then that’s fine (although it still rang!) but if not then just have ‘the phone rang’.
  • anymoreis time e.g. I don’t want this anymore… whereas any moreis quantity, e.g. do you have any more cake? 🙂
  • Technically, ‘now’ (and right now) is present tense, which is fine in dialogue but not in past tense narration. All, now, very and just are often overused so I recommend seeing how many you have in a piece and chopping where possible.
  • I add commas where a reader would breathe if reading the piece aloud, which I always recommend the author do too, especially where a scene feels flat or you think it doesn’t work for whatever reason.
  • Speaking of commas… Although grammatically correct, I recommend that you don’t put commas between adjectives. At least not so many. It slows the pace… really slows it where there are several. In my opinion, commas work best when the reader is supposed to breathe (or the writer wants to make the reader pause for a particular reason). They wouldn’t need to when describing an object and anything that slows what should be a fast-paced page-turning read is best avoided.

Although Morgen judges on the impact of the stories and the quality of the writing, it’s always disappointing when there are simple spelling mistakes or even simpler errors that should have been picked up during the editing process. Please do read your stories carefully before submitting and ideally show them to someone you trust for their opinion.

*Should you get through to the longlist of 30 stories (three per month over ten months), it doesn’t necessarily mean that your story won’t be chosen if it slips out of the top ten. No author will appear in the top ten twice so a story that came eleventh (or twelfth, thirteenth…) could be bumped up where there are author duplications.

And now you can also receive feedback on your story / stories at £5 per story with the optional critique service (given by the judge, Morgen Bailey, who is a professional editor for publishers and independent authors). This option is detailed on the main 500-word Competition page with an option to select critique within the entry form.

N.B. All the money from this competition goes to BeaconLit funds for the local libraries. Morgen is not charging for her time. Good luck!

Posted in competitions, writing

BeaconLit’s 500-word comp is open for April

Hello everyone. Yes, March’s theme of ‘your main character is an inanimate object’ (how much fun was that!) has closed and April’s competition is now open. The theme is ‘the committee’, to be used in any way you would like. Rules, prizes, entry form etc. via https://beaconlitblog.wordpress.com/500-word-competition.

NB. If you have stories ready for future themes, please don’t submit them until the relevant month as the entry will be disqualified with no refund given, and you won’t be able to submit it in the correct month (because we will have seen it). It’s rule number four. 🙂